<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Consumer Rights &#187; Fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ashisha.com/consumer/tag/fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ashisha.com/consumer</link>
	<description>Issues dealing with consumer rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 19:07:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8856</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SEBI told to work towards compensating fraud-hit investors</title>
		<link>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2009/11/23/sebi-told-to-work-towards-compensating-fraud-hit-investors/</link>
		<comments>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2009/11/23/sebi-told-to-work-towards-compensating-fraud-hit-investors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grievance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Punishment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Price Manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Securities and Exchange Board of India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Investor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanishing Companies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashisha.com/consumer/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEBI (the Securities and Exchange Board of India) has the mandate to protect investors, especially the retail and small investors who can get defrauded on various stock market deviancies, fraud, and management frauds. And SEBI has taken a number of actions in the past to act against people who have sought to defraud investors, such [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEBI (the Securities and Exchange Board of India) has the mandate to protect investors, especially the retail and small investors who can get defrauded on various stock market deviancies, fraud, and management frauds. And SEBI has taken a number of actions in the past to act against people who have sought to defraud investors, such as banning people from the market, or preventing access to the market for such white collar criminals.<br />
However, there have been a number of cases where investors, especially the smaller investors have got defrauded in the past, and when calls have been made for SEBI to either act on behalf of getting compensation to these hapless investors or being more proactive, the actions of SEBI leave some room for improvement. Some of these cases are related to vanishing companies, or to frauds, or to price manipulation (<a href="http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Views/Recommendations/Compensate-fraud-hit-investors/articleshow/5259062.cms" target="_blank">link to article</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>
Undoubtedly, SEBI has done a lot to protect the interest of investors. There are, however, some areas where action needs to be initiated to ensure that investors, particularly small gullible ones, are protected from unscrupulous promoters, conniving auditors and mercenary manipulators.<br />
The limited punitive actions taken by the department of corporate affairs and SEBI against the companies and their directors do not answer the basic question of compensating the investors who for no rhyme or reason are the losers. The argument that investment in equities is a matter of risk and reward cannot be extended to the frauds committed by these companies. Small investors, at least up to Rs 25,000, need to be compensated.
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2009/11/23/sebi-told-to-work-towards-compensating-fraud-hit-investors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Safety feature &#8211; Online Credit card usage</title>
		<link>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2009/07/30/safety-feature-online-credit-card-usage/</link>
		<comments>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2009/07/30/safety-feature-online-credit-card-usage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Transaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashisha.com/consumer/?p=268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you have ever stopped to look at the online credit usage you would have done (including reviewed the information you were asked to provide), it would seem extremely easy to use somebody&#8217;s card and use it for buying stuff. What is it that you need to provide in terms of information when using your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have ever stopped to look at the online credit usage you would have done (including reviewed the information you were asked to provide), it would seem extremely easy to use somebody&#8217;s card and use it for buying stuff. What is it that you need to provide in terms of information when using your credit card online ? You go to a site, decide to buy something (maybe jewellery, maybe some electronics goods, or something that can be delivered instantaneously such as software) and are asked whether you need to pay through a credit card, using the much hyped secure card payment gateways (that use &#8217;128 bit encryption security&#8217;, and are from well known banks).<br />
Think for a minute about the information you provide online; you typically provide the following information:<br />
- Name<br />
- Date of birth (sometimes)<br />
- Card Number<br />
- 3 / 4 Digit security code at the back of the card<br />
- Validity period of the card<br />
Now, if you had gone to a restaurant, and paid by card, the person taking the billing (waiter, cashier) would already have all these details (except for Date of Birth), and for that, if they ask you to fill a card containing personal details such as DOB and anniversary, most of us would fill that already. That is enough for them to use that card details online, and in many cases, this goes undetected, or detected only at the end of the month. So why is nothing being done about this ?<br />
Well, something is finally being done <a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/NEWS/Business/India-Business/Credit-card-PIN-a-must-for-online-shopping/articleshow/4836223.cms" target="_blank">(link to article)</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
If you&#8217;re an online shopaholic, make sure you have a personal identification number (PIN)/password for your credit or debit cards. Otherwise, forget about using them for internet shopping from August 1. A recent directive by the Reserve Bank of India makes it mandatory to have an additional authentication passcode verified by Visa or MSC (Mastercard Secure Code). This is in addition to the other information already on the card like name, card number, expiry date and CVV (card verification value) number<br />
So how do you get this new password? Credit/debit card users have to register online with their banks, giving personal and card details. They will then be given a PIN or password to be be used as an additional layer of security at the checkout point before completion of the transaction.
</p></blockquote>
<p>So, if you did not know about this directive, and wonder as to why your card does not seem to work online anymore, now you know the reasons for the same. So, go ahead, and contact your bank for getting the confirmation. As to whether this is fool-proof, only time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2009/07/30/safety-feature-online-credit-card-usage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Branded fuels &#8211; do they really provide any benefits</title>
		<link>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2009/04/06/branded-fuels-do-they-really-provide-any-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2009/04/06/branded-fuels-do-they-really-provide-any-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extra Charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diesel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRTPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Premium]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashisha.com/consumer/?p=229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You must have seen this all the time. You go to a fuel pump, and they ask you whether you want the premium fuel (whether it is petrol or diesel); in some cases, they will tell you that the premium fuel is better for your engine, as well as for the mileage of your vehicle. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You must have seen this all the time. You go to a fuel pump, and they ask you whether you want the premium fuel (whether it is petrol or diesel); in some cases, they will tell you that the premium fuel is better for your engine, as well as for the mileage of your vehicle. The fuel will have the name of &#8216;Premium&#8217;, &#8216;Turbo&#8217;, or &#8216;Speed&#8217;, all designed to make sure that you feel that you are taking a fuel much better than the traditional fuel. The television advertisements are all designed to project the same thing, with the fuel supposed to have additives that smoothen the engine, and deliver many other benefits.<br />
Months back, when fuel prices were very high, the oil companies were actually forcing higher consumption of these branded fuel through greater marketing campaigns, as well as through actual constriction of supply of the non-branded fuel at the fuel pumps. So, what is the reality of these branded fuels ? Do their consistent campaigns have any real substance to them ? Does your vehicle benefit if you use such fuels ? Well, the MRTPC did a study, and found that there was no evidence to backup these claims (link to article):</p>
<blockquote><p>
Next time you pay Rs 2 extra per litre to tank up on branded petrol, you are probably being taken for a ride. For, the state-run oil marketing companies have failed to back up their claim of this fuel giving higher mileage and better engine performance before the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission (MRTPC). MRTPC had asked the companies to &#8220;clarify the quantitive difference between normal fuel and branded fuel alongwith supportive documents.&#8221;<br />
The query, however, failed to get the companies to furnish anything more than letters from additive suppliers in support their claim. While the additive suppliers, the Singapore branch of Chevron and Oronite, have spoken about the benefits of branded fuel, it has failed to impress the Commission as it doesn&#8217;t regard the suppliers as non-partial authority; on the contrary they are viewed as vested interests. The suppliers&#8217; certificates do not talk about any test having been carried out on branded petrol<br />
.</p></blockquote>
<p>So, the net result is that oil companies claim that these additives are being used the world over, and are from companies that provide these to fuels all over the world. However, in the absence of any proof, paying extra for these fuels is a risk that a person is taking; there is a good chance that you do not any benefit commensurate with the additional price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2009/04/06/branded-fuels-do-they-really-provide-any-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The case of huge discounts on clothes</title>
		<link>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2009/02/08/the-case-of-huge-discounts-on-clothes/</link>
		<comments>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2009/02/08/the-case-of-huge-discounts-on-clothes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 18:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clothing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extra Charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apparel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clothes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Customer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discount]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retailer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shop]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashisha.com/consumer/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nowadays, there are a number of shops (primarily in the area of apparel and clothing) that seek to attract customers through offering huge discounts. So you have brands such as Priknit offering 80% sale on their jackets, Cantabil offering 80% discount on all clothes, Pepe Jeans branding a sale logo of Buy 2, get 2 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowadays, there are a number of shops (primarily in the area of apparel and clothing) that seek to attract customers through offering huge discounts. So you have brands such as Priknit offering 80% sale on their jackets, Cantabil offering 80% discount on all clothes, Pepe Jeans branding a sale logo of Buy 2, get 2 free, Kouton&#8217;s offering 50% + 50% and so on. I have been shopping in many of these, and realize that there is a huge amount of anti-consumer intent behind many of these. A lot of the numbers are inflated, and actual good quality is scarce. So let&#8217;s take some specific examples, and see what goes on:</p>
<p>- Pepe Jeans: The store had this huge sales sign outside proclaiming that if you buy 2, then you get 2 free (and of course they had the &#8216;*&#8217;, means that some conditions will apply). However, if you thought that this was a great bargain for getting 2 Pepe jeans, then think again. The offer was only for Pepe T-shirts, something that they forgot to put in the huge sign.</p>
<p>- Priknit: I was looking for some discounted jackets for the next season, and Priknit with it&#8217;s 80% offer seemed fishy, but why not give it a try. So off I went to the Shipra Mall in Indirapuram in the NCR region, and entered the store over there. I looked at a jacket when inside, and speculated that such a jacket should not cost more than Rs. 2,000 at the most, and it looked impressive, and with 80% discount, could be considered for buying. Imagine the shock when the list price of the jacket was listed at Rs. 4,000, and on a closer look, some of the threads on the jacket seemed to be awry. And there were some better jackets that were listed at Rs. 6,000 &#8211; you could have knocked me down with a feather.</p>
<p>- Cantabil was the next one &#8211; Here also there was a 80% discount. Well, guess what, more of the same. Shirts (and nothing spectacular) were listed at Rs. 1600. I am pretty sure that people would not have even looked at the store again if these shirts were retailed at their full list price; I made a quick exit from the store. If I wanted to buy such shirts, would rather go to a much better place. </p>
<p>- Kouton was the first such brand that was offering these 75% kind of discounts on clothes, and I remember buying some pretty great looking shirts from at discounted prices of Rs. 400, and those shirts looked great, but when I had gone there recently, the quality and designs had degraded.</p>
<p>Final realization: What looks like a bargain may not be a bargain (there is this psychological thing where you end up buying something if it seems to be a great bargain, and you have to spend some effort in order to prevent yourself from falling under this spell), and a lot of these retailers are indulging in some pretty ugly anti-consumer practices. Please add more such issues you know about in comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2009/02/08/the-case-of-huge-discounts-on-clothes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another case, person gets bill for &#8216;ghost&#8217; credit card</title>
		<link>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/09/23/another-case-person-gets-bill-for-ghost-credit-card/</link>
		<comments>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/09/23/another-case-person-gets-bill-for-ghost-credit-card/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extra Charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grievance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harassement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/09/23/another-case-person-gets-bill-for-ghost-credit-card/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It happens again and again. A person either has not accepted the credit card that was provided to him even when he had not requested the credit card, or he was charged for some amount where he did not make the transactions. Mistakes can happen, even though in cases of a financial nature, one would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It happens again and again. A person either has not accepted the credit card that was provided to him even when he had not requested the credit card, or he was charged for some amount where he did not make the transactions. Mistakes can happen, even though in cases of a financial nature, one would expect a much greater deal of carefulness on the part of the bank. However, what really takes the cake is when the bank refuses to come clean, or behaves in a manner that is totally against <a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Mumbai/Man_asked_to_pay_for_ghost_credit_card_/articleshow/3492212.cms" target="_blank">accepted consumer service behavior</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Paresh Karia (30), the owner of Jeetendra General Store, a grocery shop near Sonapur Lane in Kurla (W), was in for a shock when he received an ABN Amro credit card statement for June showing Rs 44,900 as due. Karia claimed that he never received the credit card. Karia said he approached the bank several times, but they did not reply. The bank allegedly did not even respond to his advocates&#8217; letters. According to him, the bank has even started sending notices and making calls. &#8220;In the last two months, I have received over 15 calls from the bank&#8217;s recovery department, threatening me and demanding repayment of the dues and the late fees.&#8221;<br />
He said, &#8220;In April, one of the bank&#8217;s telemarketing executive called me, asking me to apply for the bank&#8217;s credit card. At first, I refused, but the executive kept calling me, after which, I took the card. In May, the executive took my signature on the form, and took documents like PAN card and my HSBC Bank statement.&#8221; After 15 days, Karia received a confirmation call from the bank to verify the documents. However, Karia refused to give the details on phone and asked the executive to come down to his shop. &#8220;The next day, I received a parcel from the bank,&#8221; said Karia.
</p></blockquote>
<p>From time to time, the RBI and various Consumer forums have asked banks and other financial institutions to behave, and many times charged penalties, but these incidents keep on happening. It will come to a time when courts will actually start hauling executives of the banks before the court, like a court almost did to the ICICI Chief.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/09/23/another-case-person-gets-bill-for-ghost-credit-card/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ICICI &#8216;payable-at-par&#8217; checks</title>
		<link>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/09/19/icici-payable-at-par-checks/</link>
		<comments>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/09/19/icici-payable-at-par-checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Complaint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extra Charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/09/19/icici-payable-at-par-checks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is about a seemingly big fraud that India&#8217;s largest private sector bank is playing on its customers, giving a designation for something, and then doing something that is directly opposite, just so that they can squeeze their customers even more. I used to work in Chennai, and had an ICICI account over there (that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is about a seemingly big fraud that India&#8217;s largest private sector bank is playing on its customers, giving a designation for something, and then doing something that is directly opposite, just so that they can squeeze their customers even more.<br />
I used to work in Chennai, and had an ICICI account over there (that was a salary account). Later, I used the same account for linking to the ICICIDirect stock trading facility. Some time later, I switched jobs and cities, and moved over to the capital city, Delhi. While migrating many of my details, I asked the local ICICI bank about what I should do about my existing account, and they informed me that I can use my account as is, except that checks that I issued would involve an additional charge because of the different city status. Okay, so I stopped using the ICICI Bank account for this purpose, and used my alternative salary account instead for check issual.<br />
However, this always was a bit irritating since the stock trading account being ICICI meant that a lot of inflow and outflow would go through the ICICI account, and not being able to use the money for checks meant a small inconvenience. Imagine my pleasure some time later when I learned that ICICI Bank was now issuing payable-at-par checks. I started using these for regular transactions in Delhi, and imagine the shock when I saw a multi-city charge to my account. Upon asking ICICI Bank about this charge, guess what they told me about the &#8216;payable-at-par&#8217; checks ?<br />
&#8220;Multi-city cheque payment charge is a charge for clearing a payable-at-par cheque at an outstation location (i.e. outside your city).&#8221;<br />
Further, this is their definition of what payable-at-par means:<br />
&#8220;Please note that &#8216;Payable at par&#8217; means a cheque is payable at any location in India.&#8221;<br />
Very strange. So were they claiming that their earlier checks would not get paid if I gave them to somebody in Delhi ? I don&#8217;t see what benefit their customers are getting as per their definition of &#8216;payable-at-par&#8217;, it is only ICICI Bank that can claim that they are also issuing payable at par checks, and yet get away with charging a penalty to their users.<br />
I tried using their complaint site at https://infinity.icicibank.co.in/salesEARWeb/web/rbi/jsp/index.jsp, but it built using Javascript, and the complaint option did not work (maybe they do not want to see complaints) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/09/19/icici-payable-at-par-checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scam by companies selling cheap travel packages</title>
		<link>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/09/04/scam-by-companies-selling-cheap-travel-packages/</link>
		<comments>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/09/04/scam-by-companies-selling-cheap-travel-packages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extra Charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Package]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/09/04/scam-by-companies-selling-cheap-travel-packages/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, I got a call from my spouse about contact from a travel package company. A company called XS Travel Club had contacted my spouse with grand promises of a great package &#8211; for Rs. 5000, you get a 3-4 days 4 nights package at locations varying from Mussorie to Shimla to Goa to Bangkok. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I got a call from my spouse about contact from a travel package company. A company called XS Travel Club had contacted my spouse with grand promises of a great package &#8211; for Rs. 5000, you get a 3-4 days 4 nights package at locations varying from Mussorie to Shimla to Goa to Bangkok. Sounds good, right ? But there was more. There was 10 complimentary beauty treatments from the various Delhi outlets of BodyCare (typically things such as facials, massages, hair treatment, etc). And there were 10 dining coupons from 5 restaurants in different places in Delhi. Since I had more experience in handling such kind of things, my wife gave my contact to these people, and they contacted me. I talked on the phone to them, asked about the holiday resorts (the names they took sounded good), and even the restaurants looked fine. So I asked them to come over to my office for showing me the package and taking the Rs. 5000 from me.<br />
They were at my office the next day, and everything was there &#8211; the stay vouchers, the dining coupons, and the BodyCare coupons. So I started reading and discovered a few interesting things:<br />
- There was a separate processing charge of Rs. 199 mentioned in the terms and conditions<br />
- For every night, there was an additional charge of Rs. 399 to be paid<br />
- Places like Manali / Mussorie / Shimla did not allow the coupons to be used during the following months (yes, you must have guessed by now &#8211; the summer months; so no using of these coupons between April and July)<br />
- so, overall they were going to be charging me Rs. 1400 more if I used the travel package (which is almost 30% additional over the Rs. 5000 they wanted to charge initially)<br />
When I spoke to the person who had contacted me, he spoke to his manager (and I could hear the conversation to some degree). In effect, his manager said that they should tell me to take my vacation in August, and not in summer.<br />
By this time, I was not exactly a cool cucumber, and I gave a piece of my mind to the guy who had spoken to me. In effect, what he had done was deceitful since he had not told me these conditions, and since I had opened the fine print, I came to know, else I would not have known.<br />
He assured me that they would not charge these Rs. 1400, and would change the not allowed period of the package to some other time, but when I asked him to make that in the written terms and conditions, he did not respond.<br />
What could have gone wrong ? Learnings:<br />
- If I had taken the coupons without checking, I would have been stuck with those conditions, and would have been cursing myself for not looking at this more carefully.<br />
- If I take the person&#8217;s oral committment about getting the money and period waiver without getting that in a written form, it is not something that would have held up later. After all, the person whom I would have spoken to later may deny any suck knowledge and I would have been stuck.</p>
<p>Thus, be very watchful when you see such offers, and always take the time to do a study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/09/04/scam-by-companies-selling-cheap-travel-packages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recovery agents involved in fraud</title>
		<link>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/08/26/recovery-agents-involved-in-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/08/26/recovery-agents-involved-in-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ashish</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancellation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Delhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Credit Card]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/08/26/recovery-agents-involved-in-fraud/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This scenario is one of the biggest fears that people have when dealing with credit cards, and handing this information off to other parties. You hand this off to a person purporting to come from a bank, and then find that charges are being piled on your credit card, and then have to run around [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This scenario is one of the biggest fears that people have when dealing with credit cards, and handing this information off to other parties. You hand this off to a person purporting to come from a bank, and then find that charges are being piled on your credit card, and then have to run around in trying to clear yourself of these extra charges. It can get real frustrating and annoying for people to have to deal with such kind of problems. The normal tendency is to blame the bank for keeping such people on their rolls, for having such a process where misuse can happen, and for then being insensitive to the problems they are facing. <a href="http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Delhi/Manager_2_recovery_agents_arrested_for_credit_card_fraud/articleshow/3398013.cms" target="_blank">Read more about the incident</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The manager of a Delhi-based private firm was arrested along with two accomplices on Friday on charges of allegedly making purchases using the credit card of an ICICI bank customer.<br />
&#8220;We registered a case on the complaint of Atri and arrested Goyal from the Rohini branch of ICICI Bank. The other two were arrested at the instance of Goyal. During interrogation it was revealed that Goyal is the manager of i-process, an outsourcing private company of ICICI Bank, dealing with credit card users whereas accused Ashish Katyan and Dev Aggarwal were working as recovery agents in another collection agency,&#8221; said DCP (outer) Atul Katiyar. &#8220;The accused used to contact the customers and introduce themselves using a fake name. Then they used to send Ashish Katyan for collecting the card from consumers. Instead of blocking the cards, the three used to go shopping.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The basis for the information that these thieves come up with is information that the bank has revealed to them, so the bank should be the one to blame for this. In the process of reducing their costs by outsourcing this service, they have let such a thing happen, and hence need to be penalized. If this was a country with stronger implementation of privacy and data theft laws, the bank would be in serious trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ashisha.com/consumer/2008/08/26/recovery-agents-involved-in-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
